On November 19, 2025, the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) and U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) published a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (“NPRM”) that would rescind the 2022 Public Charge Ground of Inadmissibility Final Rule and replace it with a significantly broader and more discretionary framework. The public comment period closes on December 19, 2025, and the rule may be finalized as soon as 30 days thereafter, making early 2026 the earliest potential effective date.
If finalized, the proposed rule would make public charge determinations more stringent, more subjective, and less predictable for foreign national employees applying for visas or adjustment of status.
Background
Under the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA), a foreign national is inadmissible if they are likely at any time to become a public charge. The 2022 Final Rule requires officers to assess public charge risk using five statutory factors:
- Age;
- Health;
- Family status;
- Assets, resources, and financial status; and
- Education and skills.
Additionally, current regulations require consideration of:
- Affidavit of support (Form I-864), where required, and
- Current or past receipt of certain public benefits.
Key Changes Proposed in the NPRM
- Removal of the “Primarily Dependent” Standard
DHS proposes to eliminate the regulatory definition from the 2022 Final Rule that limited public charge inadmissibility to individuals “primarily dependent” on cash assistance or long-term institutionalization. Instead, DHS would allow officers to assess dependence on any public resources to meet needs, under a more flexible “totality of circumstances” framework. - Removal of Regulatory Limitations on Public Benefit Types Considered
The NPRM would remove the limitation in the 2022 rule that only certain benefits, namely public cash assistance for income maintenance or long-term institutionalization, count for public charge purposes. Under the proposed rule, DHS would no longer restrict consideration to those categories, meaning a broader range of means-tested benefits could be weighed. This expands the types of public benefits that could negatively influence public charge determinations. - Expanded Fact Finding Discretion
Under the proposed rule, DHS officers could consider any factor or information they deem relevant, extending their discretion well beyond the five statutory factors. By removing restrictive limits on benefit types and definitions, DHS intends to make public charge determinations that more fully reflect an individual’s ability to rely on personal resources, family, sponsors, or private support.
However, this broader discretion also introduces greater subjectivity into the decision-making process. Applicants may face less predictable outcomes, increased documentation requirements, and less transparent adjudications, as officers can weigh a wide range of circumstances on a case-by-case basis.
Implications for Employers and Foreign National Employees
While many foreign national employees, particularly in employer-sponsored categories, may not face substantive changes, the proposed rule is likely to increase procedural and evidentiary burdens. Applicants may encounter more Requests for Evidence from USCIS, expanded questioning during consular interviews, and a need to submit additional documentation regarding financial resources, employment history, assets, and dependents’ benefit use.
Gibney will continue to monitor developments and provide updates as additional information becomes available.