FY 2019 H-1B Cap Random Selection Process Complete

On May 15, 2018, United States Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) announced that it completed the computer-generated random lottery selection process for cap-subject H-1B petitions filed for Fiscal Year (FY) 2019 (October 1, 2018 to September 30, 2019).

The H-1B Cap Lottery Process
USCIS received 190,098 new H-1B petitions for FY2019, exceeding the 65,000 visas allocated under the regular statutory cap for Bachelor’s degree holders and the additional 20,000 visas available under the advanced-degree exemption for U.S. Master’s degree holders. Last year, USCIS received over 199,000 H-1B petitions during the FY2018 H-1B cap filing period. USCIS conducted the lottery selection process for H-1B visa petitions submitted seeking the advanced-degree exemption (U.S. Master’s Cap) first. All unselected U.S. Master’s Cap petitions were then included in the second lottery selection process conducted for petitions filed under the regular Bachelor’s degree statutory cap.

What Employers Can Expect
As previously announced, USCIS has suspended premium processing for all H-1B cap-subject petitions. All selected petitions will be processed under the regular processing timeline and petitioners may not receive notice of selection for several more weeks. Any petitions that are not selected under the FY2019 cap will be rejected and returned by USCIS with the filing fees.

Gibney will work with any impacted clients to explore alternatives and options for employees who have not been able to obtain an H-1B visa number under the FY2019 cap.

Cap-Exempt Petitions
As a reminder, USCIS will continue to accept and process H-1B petitions that are cap-exempt. These include filings for extensions, amended petitions, changes of employer, concurrent employment for existing H-1B workers, and petitions filed by organizations that are cap-exempt. At this time, premium processing remains in place for H-1B petitions that are cap-exempt.

If you have any questions regarding this alert, please contact your designated Gibney representative, or email info@gibney.com.

Planning It Right the Second Time Around

According to a study by the National Center for Health Statistics of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, 20% of first marriages face “disruption” (defined as separation or divorce) within the first five years. One-half of all first marriages face disruption within the first 20 years of marriage.

After disruption of the marriage, most people remarry. 75% of divorced women remarry within ten years. This trend toward multiple marriages has resulted in millions of “blended” families. While each family is unique, blended families bring even more challenges for estate planning. Each spouse may have children from prior marriages and the two spouses may have children together. Spouses may come to the marriage from different financial positions.

In the traditional couple’s estate plan, the couple wants the surviving spouse to have access to all of the assets at the first spouse’s death. They typically want the assets split equally among their children at the death of the survivor. This traditional couple’s plan often does not meet the needs of blended families.

A growing number of blended families will use a combination of two trusts to gain greater flexibility. The first trust, the Family Trust, contains the first spouse’s estate tax applicable exclusion amount. The assets in the Family Trust can be used for the benefit of any of the children when the predeceasing spouse wishes to benefit. The assets can also be used for the surviving spouse. The second trust is a Qualified Terminable Interest in Property (QTIP) Trust. A QTIP Trust leaves assets in trust for the surviving spouse. All of the income goes to the surviving spouse during his or her lifetime.

However, at the death of the surviving spouse, the assets are distributed as the predeceasing spouse directed. In other words, the assets could go to the children of the predeceasing spouse if desired. The surviving spouse does not have to have the ability to alter the disposition. By leaving assets in the QTIP Trust, they qualify for a marital deduction at the death of the first spouse. This means there need not be any estate tax due at the death of the first spouse.

The assets of the other spouse can have a completely different set of beneficiaries than the assets of the predeceasing spouse. So, the husband could leave the assets in the Family Trust to the wife for her life and then to his own children. On the other hand, the wife may decide the husband has sufficient assets and leave the Family Trust directly to her own children, excluding the husband. Both the husband and wife might decide to leave assets over the estate tax exclusion amount in QTIP Trusts for each other.

Each blended family is unique. Each couple has its own set of goals to accomplish. Proper estate planning can tailor a solution to help meet those goals. A qualified estate planning attorney can help you decide upon a plan that fits your unique situation.

DIVORCE, TAXES AND YOUR ESTATE PLAN

Fortunately, some good news does exist within the arena of divorce, and it comes from none other than the IRS. Here’s the benefit. The IRS generally does not consider the transfer of assets between divorcing spouses a taxable event. This includes cash that one spouse pays another as part of the divorce settlement. There are a few restrictions to this rule, but as long as you can demonstrate that you are divorcing for legitimate reasons not related to tax savings, you and your soon-to be ex could transfer cash and assets without fear of a tax gain or loss to either party. At least, not in the short-term future.

DEPENDENCY TAX EXEMPTION FOR CHILDREN

As in most divorce settlement negotiations, you and your spouse will probably have several bargaining chips on the table. One may be the dependency exemption for your children. These exemptions mean a lot to lower and middle income taxpayers, but not as much to high income Americans as a result of the deduction phase out.
But as often happens after divorce, there may be a significant disparity in earnings between you and your spouse. And in that case, the dependency exemption may become a chip worth bargaining for.

FILING STATUS

Couples whose divorce won’t be concluded by December 31 of a given year will have to make a difficult decision regarding the filing status they choose on their tax returns. Married filing separate is the most costly filing status available. That’s why, if you and your spouse can agree to it, you may want to continue filing jointly until your divorce is final. There are two notable exceptions to this rule, however.

Exception 1: You probably shouldn’t file jointly if your spouse has incurred taxes that he or she won’t be able to pay. By filing jointly, you assume liability for your spouse’s taxes as well as your own. If the IRS can’t get satisfaction from your spouse, it will turn to you for payment.

Exception 2: You may not want to file jointly if you suspect that your spouse isn’t fully disclosing income or is falsifying deductions. Once again, you may be held liable for your spouse’s tax liability, plus associated penalties.

WHO GETS THE CAPITAL GAINS?

Let’s assume that you are your spouse own stock that has appreciated substantially since you bought it. Purchased for $50,000 five years ago, the stock is now worth $100,000. If the two of you decide to sell the shares today, the gain would be $50,000, or the difference between your original investment and the selling price.

If you decide you’d like to keep the stock, and pay your spouse $50,000 (half the current market value) for full ownership, your total investment becomes $75,000. However, if you sell the shares, the cost basis used to determine your capital gains taxes won’t be the $75,000 you’ve actually invested in the stock. Instead, the government will look at your original cost basis – $25,000 – and your spouse’s original cost basis – also $25,000 – and deem that your actual cost basis is just $50,000! Therefore, the $50,000 cash you paid your ex-spouse for the stock goes to him or her tax free, while you are left with a hefty capital gains tax.

WHICH ESTATE PLANNING STRATEGY IS BEST?

Fortunately, all the problems described above can be neatly countered with a well-designed tax and estate plan. If you already have an estate plan in place, your main concern will be having it updated as a result of the new changes that your divorce has introduced into your life. For most, these estate planning issues are of greatest concern during a divorce:

  • Controlling to whom, when and how assets are divided today, and how they will be distributed after death
  • Capturing every tax break available during the divorce transition
  • Maintaining control and management of certain assets
  • Renaming beneficiaries

Here are three estate planning strategies that may help you achieve these objectives:

The Revocable Living Trust

This popular estate planning tool is unlike a will in that it allows you to avoid probate which brings on potential delays, expenses and public exposure. Instead, upon your death, your designated Successor Trustee assumes responsibility for management and distribution of your assets, which are owned by your Revocable Living Trust. Your trustee will follow the directions you have provided in your trust documents, including when you want assets distributed, to whom and by what means.

The Children’s Trust

Another estate planning strategy popular among parents is the Children’s Trust. It allows you to set aside funds which may be used at a later time to pay for college education or purchase a first residence.

The Irrevocable Life Insurance Trust

The Irrevocable Life Insurance Trust, or ILIT, accomplishes several important objectives. First, it lets you remain in control of the distribution of your life insurance policy’s proceeds long after you’re gone. As with the Children’s Trust, the ILIT disperses policy proceeds to your beneficiaries when and how you want. Because the trustee of the ILIT is your designee, you also ensure the proceeds remain out of your ex-spouse’s reach.

GETTING HELP

Any of these solutions, or a combination of all three, may help you achieve the tax advantages and control you seek. Equally important is the peace of mind you’ll gain when you know that, come what may, your children will be well provided for. ecause your goals and your family’s situation are unique, seek out the counsel of an attorney who concentrates on these estate planning strategies. Only he or she will be able to show you how you can best employ them for your children’s benefit.

© American Academy of Estate Planning Attorneys, Inc.

New York Employers Should Prepare for New Sexual Harassment Legislation

In April 2018, both New York State and New York City enacted significant legislation addressing sexual harassment in the workplace through education, prevention, and increased transparency, and broadening the scope of anti-discrimination laws applicable to sexual harassment and gender based discrimination. The following are the most significant provisions affecting private employers:

New York State Provisions

Removing Confidentiality Provisions from Settlement Agreements
Settlement agreements will no longer be permitted to include a confidentiality provision that would keep private the facts and circumstances giving rise to the sexual harassment claim unless specifically requested by the claimant. The same provision also adopts the Older Worker Benefit Protection Act time frames for considering a settlement of a sexual harassment claim, giving the claimant 21 days to consider the agreement and 7 days after signing to revoke it.

Preventing Private Arbitration of Sexual Harassment Claims
The new law prohibits contractual provisions requiring arbitration of sexual harassment claims, except as provided in collective bargaining agreements. This provision may apply to few employers because in many instances it may be preempted by the Federal Arbitration Act (FAA) which allows for such arbitrations. The FAA generally applies, except where the employer’s business does not affect interstate commerce or where the parties agree to apply New York arbitration law rather than the FAA.

Expanding the Categories of Workers Who May Bring Sexual Harassment Claims
An employer may be liable for sexual harassment of non-employees, including contractors, vendors, and consultants where the employer knew or should have known the non-employee was subject to sexual harassment in the workplace and failed to take prompt remedial action.

Formulating Model Policies and Training Materials
The new law authorizes the State to create model sexual harassment policies and training programs. Private employers will need to provide a written sexual harassment policy to employees and provide annual training that equals or exceeds the minimum standards set out in the models. The policy must include a standard complaint form and a procedure for timely and confidential investigation of complaints that ensures due process for all parties.

New York City Provisions

On April 11, 2018, the New York City Council passed the Stop Sexual Harassment in NYC Act which is expected to be signed by Mayor de Blasio in the coming days. The legislation, aimed at stopping sexual harassment in New York City, includes the following significant provisions:

Expanding Employers Covered by City Gender Discrimination Laws
While the New York City Human Rights Law (NYCHRL) previously only applied to employers of 4 or more employees, the new law expands the scope of the gender based discrimination provisions to include employers of even a single employee.

Extending Statute of Limitations
The time for filing complaints with the New York City Commission on Human Rights on (CCHR) involving gender-based harassment will be extended from one year, to three years from the date of the harassment.

Notice of Anti-Sexual Harassment Rights and Responsibilities
All New York City employers regardless of the number of employees will be required to display an anti-sexual harassment rights and responsibilities poster to be designed by the CCHR and to distribute a CCHR information sheet on sexual harassment to their employees. Requirements will become effective 120 days after enactment of the law.

Mandatory Annual Interactive Training for All Employees
One year after enactment of the law, all New York City employers with 15 or more employees will need to conduct annual interactive anti-sexual harassment training for all employees. At a minimum, the training must include:

  • An explanation of sexual harassment as a form of unlawful discrimination under local, state and federal law;
  • Practical examples of what sexual harassment is and is not;
  • A review of internal complaint processes;
  • A review of the complaint processes available through the CCHR, the New York State Division of Human Rights and the United States Equal Employment Opportunity Commission;
  • A review of legal prohibitions on retaliation; and
  • The importance of bystander intervention.

Separate training also must be provided for supervisory and managerial employees covering their responsibilities for prevention and response to harassment and avoidance of retaliation. Employers will be required to keep a record of all trainings for three years, including signed employee acknowledgements.

Impact on Employers

  • Employers should take advantage of the introduction of these new laws to review all of their sexual harassment policies and procedures, focusing on the following:
  • Review existing anti-sexual harassment policies, retaliation policies, and investigative procedures;
  • If not yet existing, develop formal complaint forms, and identify compliant training programs for employees and supervisors;
  • Review form settlement agreements and arbitration provisions;
  • Newly covered employers with fewer than 4 employees will need to ensure they have policies and procedures in place to address sexual harassment; and
  • Employees will need to be educated on the expansion of sexual harassment protections to non-employees.

For questions about the new anti-sexual harassment laws and how best to prepare, contact:

Robert J. Tracy
Partner
Labor and Employment
(212) 705-9814
rjtracy@gibney.com

FY2019 H-1B Cap Random Lottery Selection Process Complete

On April 12, 2018, United States Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) announced that it completed the computer-generated random lottery selection process for cap-subject H-1B petitions filed for Fiscal Year (FY) 2019 (October 1, 2018 to September 30, 2019).

The H-1B Cap Lottery Process
USCIS received 190,098 new H-1B petitions for FY2019, exceeding the 65,000 visas allocated under the regular statutory cap for Bachelor’s degree holders and the additional 20,000 visas available under the advanced-degree exemption for U.S. Master’s degree holders. Last year, USCIS received 199,000 H-1B petitions during the FY2018 H-1B cap filing period. USCIS first conducted the lottery selection process for H-1B visa petitions submitted seeking the advanced-degree exemption (U.S. Master’s Cap). All unselected U.S. Master’s Cap petitions were then included in the second lottery selection process conducted for petitions filed under the regular Bachelor’s degree statutory cap.

What Employers Can Expect
As previously announced, USCIS has suspended premium processing for all H-1B cap-subject petitions. All selected petitions will be processed under the regular processing timeline and petitioners may not receive notice of selection for several more weeks. Any petitions that are not selected under the FY2019 cap will be rejected and returned by USCIS with the filing fees.

Gibney will work with any impacted clients to explore alternatives and options for employees who have not been able to obtain an H-1B visa number under the FY2019 cap.

Cap-Exempt Petitions
As a reminder, USCIS will continue to accept and process H-1B petitions that are cap-exempt. These include filings for extensions, amended petitions, changes of employer, concurrent employment for existing H-1B workers, and petitions filed by organizations that are cap-exempt.

If you have any questions regarding this alert, please contact your designated Gibney representative, or email info@gibney.com.

FY2019 H-1B Cap Reached

United States Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) announced today that it has reached the cap for new H-1B petitions filed for Fiscal Year (FY) 2019. The U.S. advanced-degree exemption to the statutory cap has also been met.

Lottery Selection
Because USCIS has received more H-1B visa petitions than are available under the FY2019 quota, any petitions received between April 2 and April 6, 2018 will become part of a random lottery selection process.

H1-B Cap Exemptions
USCIS will continue to accept and process petitions that are cap-exempt. These include filings for extensions, amended petitions, changes of employer, concurrent employment for existing H-1B workers and petitions filed by organizations that are cap-exempt.

What Employers Can Expect
USCIS has not confirmed when petition selection will be completed. Petitioners may not receive notice of selection for several weeks or more.

If you have any questions regarding this alert, please contact your designated Gibney representative, or email info@gibney.com.

What Every Senior Should Know About Probate

Just what is probate? Living probate is a legal process that determines your fate when you cannot, generally because you’ve been disabled by injury, illness, or mental incapacity. Death probate is the process that disposes of your estate after you die. Having a will virtually guarantees that your estate will go through probate. While probate attorneys might be happy with these definitions, trust attorneys would draw your attention to all the problems that come with probate: red tape, expense, publicity, delay, loss of control, and in the case of living probate, potential for personal humiliation.

THE IMPACT ON SENIORS

Way back in 1989, the American Association of Retired Persons (AARP) decided to look carefully at probate and its impact on seniors. As the organization reported in its study, Probate: Consumer Perspectives and Concerns, probate is a special concern for older Americans.
The study found that 90% of all probate cases involved the disposition of property owned by people 60 years of age or older. Because the chances of becoming incapacitated increase dramatically as we age, living probate is also much more likely to involve seniors.

AARP went on to reveal that consumers nationally spend as much as $2 billion or more each year on all probate-related expenses, with attorneys’ fees alone representing more than $1.5 billion of that amount. The study noted that attorneys’ and executors’ fees could consume as much as 20% of small estates, and as much as 10% of even uncomplicated estates . And that’s only the beginning. Add to these fees such expenses as court costs and appraisers’ fees, and your heirs could end up with a legacy that’s considerably less than you intended.

HOW PROBATE AFFECTS SENIORS’ FAMILIES

AARP found that probate usually comes into play after the surviving spouse of marriage dies. Most couples own property jointly. So, at the first death, much if not all of their property immediately becomes the sole possession of the survivor. When the survivor dies, however, their property will have to go through probate before it can pass on to their heirs. Since few couples take into consideration probate costs, many would be saddened to learn how big a dent it will make in their intended gifts.

Seniors aren’t the only ones who may be blind-sided by probate. Their children and grandchildren may feel the bite as well. A study by American Demographics Magazine revealed that many Baby Boomers are so financially strapped today that they are deferring an important financial goal: saving for retirement. Instead, they are counting on their inheritance from Mom and Dad to help pad their meager retirement funds.

So, the higher the probate fees, the less of a legacy they will receive, and the harder it will be for them to retire.

WHAT THE AARP HAS TO SAY ABOUT PROBATE

Unreasonable expenses aren’t probate’s only drawbacks. There’s also the time involved.
AARP’s study found that probate frequently lasts longer than a year. Having a will seemed to make no difference in the time required. In fact, it could drag the process out even longer.

Now, add to the expenses and delays of probate these problems: a loss of control over one’s affairs and the publicity it requires. You can see why AARP declared that:

Probate as it is generally practiced in the United States is anachronism… and, to the extent that the probate system is unreasonable, attorney’s fees in connection with the probate work are unreasonable.

WHY ATTORNEYS DISAGREE ABOUT PROBATE

AARP’s edict sums up the reason for so much rancor between pro-probate and pro-trust attorneys. It’s a matter of money, and lots of it. The AARP study noted that attorneys often build lucrative practices focused solely on probate. Many use cheap wills as a “loss leader.” According to AARP:
This marketing practice may set a costly trap for consumers. Attorneys lay the groundwork for their probate practice by writing wills. Some write wills cheaply as a way to generate other business, prompting the companion to loss leader discounts in retail trade. When the client dies, the same attorney, or other member of the firm, probates the will at a high fee enough to recover any money lost on the earlier discount.

But not all attorneys have been happy with the status quo and escalating consumer dissatisfaction with probate. A growing number, such as the members of the American Academy of Estate Planning Attorneys, would rather spare their clients the expense, delay, publicity, inconvenience and potential for public humiliation that can be such an integral part of the probate process.

IS PROBATE EVEN NECESSARY?

“Death Probate” has these primary functions:

  • It verifies the validity of your will.
  • It inventories and establishes the value of your significant assets.
  • It provides your creditors with the opportunity to make claims against your estate.
  • It gives disgruntled family members a forum for challenging your will.
  • Lastly, when all these steps have been completed, it transfers the title to your property to your heirs, as you’ve instructed in your will.

Do you really need probate to accomplish these tasks? AARP says no. Instead, it recommends alternatives such as the Revocable Living Trust.

HOW TO AVOID PROBATE WITH A LIVING TRUST

Whether you die with a will or without one, probate will be required if you owned any property in your own name. A Living Trust makes probate unnecessary by changing the way you own your property. Although you still have absolute control over all your assets, just as if you owned them directly, you do not own property in your own name. Instead, your Living Trust owns your property. And you own your Living Trust.

At first blush, that can sound like a scary proposition. But it isn’t, because you are the trust maker, the trust owner and trust beneficiary. So you and you alone control your trust and the assets it owns. You can buy, sell, trade, derive income from, mortgage and give away your trust assets, just as before. You can change your trust, add to it, or even revoke it any time you want. Bottom line: the fact that your trust owns your property has little, if any, impact on the way you live and conduct business each day.

But what a difference the trust makes when you die. Then, the person you’ve chosen to take charge of your trust, your successor trustee, steps in and follows your direction for the disposition of your estate. Because you owned no property in your own name, there’s no need for probate. So there’s no publicity and, compared to probate, very little expense, delay or inconvenience for your family.

Living Trusts are also indispensable for avoiding the indignity of living probate, the court proceedings that determine who will oversee your affairs in the event of your disability. A Living Trust helps you ensure that your physical and financial needs are handled as you would want them to be.

The Living Trust isn’t exactly a new idea. Its origins date back hundreds of years. More importantly for Americans, the concept has been used in the U.S. since 1765 when Patrick Henry drafted a trust for Robert Morris, governor of the Colony of Virginia. During this century its many proponents have included John F. Kennedy, William Waldorf Astor, John D. Rockefeller, H. L. Hunt, Bing Crosby and Frank Sinatra. As consumers become better educated about the pitfalls of probate, all signs point to Living Trusts becoming even more popular in the years ahead.

JUST FOR THE WEALTHY?

Now that you know all the problems that probate entails, it’s probably the last thing you’d want to bequeath your loved ones. But is it a strategy worth pursuing only if you’re a Rockefeller or Vanderbilt?
Absolutely not. Even if your estate is valued at no more than $100,000, you should probably have a Living Trust to avoid death probate. And regardless of how much your estate is worth, you should definitely have a Living Trust if you want to avoid living probate.

Who should you turn to for help with your Living Trust? The American Academy of Estate Planning Attorneys recommends that you start with an attorney who concentrates on this area of the law. That’s the best way to ensure that your legal professional has invested the time and energy to providing you with the most current estate planning techniques.

But be wary. Remember that wills and probate are also estate planning tools. So make sure your attorney focuses on the Living Trust, rather than wills.

GETTING THE MOST FROM YOUR LIVING TRUST

Once you’ve worked with your estate planning attorney to draw up your Living Trust, don’t stop there. Taking advantage of everything this powerful estate planning tool has to offer requires these final steps:

  • Make sure you fund your Living Trust. Remember that it only works if the title to your property has been transferred to the trust. If you keep your property in your own name, you’ve defeated its purpose. These days, most financial advisors are experienced in funding Living Trusts, so be sure to turn to your advisor for help if you need it.
  • Keep your Living Trust current. As you acquire new property, be sure that you transfer title to these assets to your Living Trust.

Ideally, a Living Trust is a living, breathing document, and a plan that will serve you for many years to come. That means, however, that you’ve got to take the time to have it updated as your family’s situation, your goals, and your needs change. A good estate planning attorney will stay in touch with you over the years to ensure your Living Trust continues to serve you well.

Yes, it is true that a Living Trust will cost you more up front than a “discount” will. But in estate plans, as in all other areas, you get what you pay for. The bargain you buy today might just cost you or your heirs a fortune – your fortune – down the road.

© American Academy of Estate Planning Attorneys, Inc.

The Trouble with Joint Tenancy

Although Joint Tenancy offers some short-term conveniences, in the long run it poses a host of problems that can cost you and your loved ones many times the expense and headaches you thought you were avoiding.

It happens almost automatically.  When you and your spouse open a checking account, buy a car, purchase a home, or acquire just about any other asset you can think of, the first — and usually only — impulse is to put the title in both your names as Joint Tenants.

Married couples aren’t the only ones relying on Joint Tenancy.  This ownership strategy is widely used by friends, life partners, parents and their children, among others.  It’s an ownership method so pervasive, many consumers often say they know of no others.

Why is Joint Tenancy so frequently employed?  Ironically, otherwise well-informed consumers choose Joint Tenancy because they’ve heard it is a cost-free replacement for a will and that it avoids probate.  These consumers focus on the fact that at the death of one of the owners, Joint Tenancy — or more precisely, Joint Tenancy with Right of Survivorship — immediately passes full ownership of an asset onto the surviving Joint Tenant by operation of law.  So, yes, it does circumvent probate and avoid the need for a will.  At least for the moment.

What all too many Americans unfortunately overlook is the fact that Joint Tenancy only temporarily avoids probate.  It also brings with it a slew of problems that more than make up for any short-term convenience it provides.  In fact, Joint Tenancy can end up costing you — and your loved ones — many times the expense and headaches you thought you were avoiding.

Consequences include:

  • Joint Tenancy may avoid probate at the first death.  But upon the death of the surviving Joint Tenant, the entire estate will have to pass through probate.
  • Joint Tenancy means that the first person to die loses all control over to whom or how his or her assets will ultimately be distributed.
  • With Joint Tenancy, spouses effectively lose their right to a double federal estate tax exclusion.
  • Depending on the state in which you reside and the state in which the joint tenancy property is located, Joint Tenancy may expose assets to capital gains taxes that otherwise could have been avoided.
  • When the Joint Tenants aren’t husband and wife, gift taxes may be due.
  • Joint Tenancy exposes one Joint Tenant to the financial risks, liabilities, and other potential problems created by the other Joint Tenant.

Let’s take a closer look at each of these areas and how they may affect you.

PROBATE, AFTER ALL

Frequently called the “Poor Man’s Will,” Joint Tenancy is often used as a replacement for wills and as a tactic for avoiding probate.  But this is only half the story.  Joint Tenancy does alleviate the need for probate when the first owner dies.  But when the second/last owner dies, the entire estate goes through the often costly, time-consuming and nightmarish probate process.

After 30 years of marriage, Gene and Marjorie Cummings had accumulated the usual trappings of married life. The home they bought 25 years ago for $100,000 was now worth $500,000. When they added in the value of their autos, furnishings, and cash accounts — all held in Joint Tenancy — they were slightly amazed to discover their estate was worth $1.5 million. When Gene died suddenly, Marjorie immediately became the sole owner of their $1.5 million estate by operation of law, circumventing the probate courts. But upon her death 15 years later, the entire estate — now worth over $2 million — was subjected to probate.

LOSING CONTROL

Today more Americans are involved in second marriages than in first. And often, remarriage means that either one or both of the partners has children from a previous marriage. Whenever a parent holds property in Joint Tenancy with a spouse, children are effectively disinherited. That’s one reason why parents with children from a prior marriage should rarely, if ever, own property in Joint Tenancy with a new spouse. Instead, remarried parents should choose ownership strategies that will help them ensure their children are well provided for in the event of their death.

Even when children from a prior marriage aren’t a factor, you may want to think twice about whether you want to give up total control over how the fruits of your life’s work are distributed at your death. Since many widows and widowers will eventually remarry, there’s a strong likelihood that someone your spouse may marry in the future will be the ultimate beneficiary of your estate. For some people, that’s of little concern. But most of us would rather see our assets benefit a relative, friend or favorite charity, rather than some stranger we’ve never met.

A TAXING ISSUE

As an estate taxation planning device, Joint Tenancy is not optimal. As the death of the first tenant, there may be little concern. Through the Unlimited Marital Deduction, the government lets spouses pass assets to one another at death estate tax-free. However, when the survivor dies, estate taxes can reduce the legacy the couple thought they were leaving behind. Why? At the death of the survivor, the value of the entire property is included in the survivor’s estate. If the sum of all of the survivor’s property is less than the amount that can be passed free of estate tax, this may not be a problem. This amount is $5 million for federal tax purposes, indexed for inflation. However, many states have a separate state estate or inheritance tax which kicks in at a much lower level.

CAPITAL GAINS EXPOSURE

Couples who live in one of the nine community property states — Arizona, California, Idaho, Louisiana, Nevada, New Mexico, Texas, Washington and Wisconsin — pay a high price when they put assets in Joint Tenancy rather than owning them as community property. In these states, using Joint Tenancy can actually expose your estate to costly capital gains taxes. Here’s how.

The capital gains tax, that often-debated revenue generator for the federal government, is a tax levied against your profit when you sell an asset. To determine the amount of capital gains against which the tax will be applied, you deduct your cost basis in the asset — meaning your investment in it — from the price it fetches when you sell it. The difference is your capital gains, and that’s the sum which will be used to compute your capital gains tax. For instance, if you bought rental property for $125,000 and sell it later for $200,000, you would owe capital gains taxes on $75,000.

The federal government provides a capital gains tax break on assets in a person’s estate. Called a step-up in basis, it simply means that when you die, the government will consider your heir’s cost basis in an asset to be its current market value, not your original purchase price. So, if the rental property you originally bought for $125,000 is worth $200,000 when you die, your heir’s cost basis would be $200,000. If your heir sells it for that price, no capital gains tax will be due.

A very taxing situation occurs, however, when you live in a community property state but hold title to an asset in Joint Tenancy with your spouse. Instead of getting that step-up in basis on the entire sum — as your survivor would if the asset were community property or owned outright by you — the government allows him or her only half the step-up in basis.  That means when the asset is sold, more of the profit will be subject to costly capital gains tax.

California residents, Nick and Sandy Worthington, had an admirable art collection, with pride of place going to an acclaimed Matisse.  It was one of the first pieces they bought, paying $50,000 for it several years ago.  When Nick died last year, the painting was appraised at a whopping $500,000!  Unfortunately, Nick and Sandy had placed ownership of the painting in both their names, as Joint Tenants, rather than owning it as community property.  That meant the painting received the favorable step-up in basis treatment on only half its value.  So, much to Sandy’s dismay, instead of a cost basis of $500,000, she now has a cost basis of only $275,000.  If she were to sell the painting today, $225,000 of her profit would be subject to capital gains tax, an expense she could have avoided completely if she and Nick had titled ownership of the painting differently.

JOINT TENANCY AND GIFT TAXES

So far, we’ve focused primarily on the impact of Joint Tenancy and married couples.  But frequently, Joint Tenancy is used as a method of ownership between non-spouses.
For instance, friends often buy property together.  An aging relative will often make a younger relative a Joint Tenant on property or cash accounts.  Parents make their children Joint Tenants with them on everything from cash accounts to cars to the family home.

Unfortunately, the government takes a dim view of these transactions, sometimes considering them to be gifts, not estate planning strategies.  That’s why many Americans are shocked to discover that the step they’ve taken to avoid wills and probate will in the long run cost them many, many times more money than it saves.  Let’s look at some examples.

When a non-spouse is added to the title of property as a Joint Tenant, the government deems it to be a gift.  Gift taxes will become due, and the donor — the person presumably making the gift — will usually be liable for the taxes.  (Under extreme circumstances, however, the done — the person receiving the gift — may become liable.)  How much gift tax is due and when it is due depends on the asset.

For example, elderly relatives commonly add a younger relative or an adult child to their checking accounts, savings accounts and other cash accounts as a convenience.  As long as the new Joint Tenant withdraws money strictly for the use of the original Joint Tenant, no gift taxes are due.  But if he or she withdraws money for personal use, the original Joint Tenant will have to pay gift taxes on that amount.

The gift tax situation is even more dire when real estate is involved.  At the time a new Joint Tenant — who is not the spouse of the original Joint Tenant — is added to the title of real property, the government considers a gift to have been made.  Gift taxes will then be due on the portion of the property the new Joint Tenant receives.  For example, if a father decides to add his son as his Joint Tenant on his personal residence, the government will consider that the son has been given a gift equal to half the home’s value, and demand the father pay gift taxes accordingly.

Of course, there are some exemptions available for gifts.  Each year you may give away up to “pre-determined dollar amount”, indexed for inflation, per individual — and to as many individuals as you want — with no gift taxes due. Gifts in excess of that amount reduce the gift and estate tax exclusion. The gift and estate tax exclusion is $5 million, adjusted annually for inflation.

So, in many cases, the mere fact that you’ve added someone’s name as Joint Tenant to your checking account or real property may not actually require you to part with cold hard cash. Even if your gift falls within the exclusions described above, however, you must still report it on your federal gift tax returns.

EXPOSURE TO RISK

When you own property with a Joint Tenant, each of you owns half of the asset. That means you effectively lose control of half the property. Whether your Joint Tenant is your spouse or someone else, the implications of this exposure to loss are frightening. For example, half of your asset held in Joint Tenancy could be lost as a result of:

  • Your Joint Tenant’s bad debts, back taxes or bankruptcy
  • Your Joint Tenant’s divorce
  • Lawsuits or damage awards filed against your Joint Tenant

More than exposure to risk, Joint Tenancy also deprives you of the day-to-day autonomy and control in managing your own asset. Consider, for example, that property is held in Joint Tenancy with someone else:

  • You may have to obtain your Joint Tenant’s consent before you sell, pledge as collateral or engage in any other transaction involving your property.
  • You may have to obtain the approval of your Joint Tenant’s spouse before you can dispose of your property.
  • Your asset may fall under the jurisdiction of your Joint Tenant’s living probate, if your Joint Tenant becomes incapacitated through illness or injury.
  • If your Joint Tenant is a child, your shared property may be the subject of guardianship hearings.
  • If your Joint Tenant is a child, you run the risk that his or her financial inexperience, emotional immaturity, or the inevitable mistakes that are part of the growing experience, may have a disastrous financial impact on your shared asset.\
  • Liquid assets — such as cash accounts — can be depleted by your Joint Tenant without any safeguards to protect you.

ALTERNATIVES TO JOINT TENANCY

Early on we said that Joint Tenancy is so pervasive, many people are hard-pressed to think of an alternative. Fortunately, there are several. For instance, you can own property solely in your own name. Or you and another person can own property as tenants in common. If you live in a community property state, you can elect that ownership option. Or, in some states, you can seek the special creditor protection spouses receive under tenants by the entirety. Each of these options avoids some of the pitfalls of Joint Tenancy.

However, none of them — and that certainly includes Joint Tenancy — is a replacement for the thoughtful estate planning that a qualified estate planning attorney can provide you.  In fact, all the objectives you might try in vain to achieve through Joint Tenancy can be achieved much more effectively through an option such as the Revocable Living Trust.  With a Revocable Living Trust, for example, you can:

Control exactly how your estate is distributed — including who your beneficiaries will be, when they will receive your legacy and how they will receive it. Ensure that children from another marriage — or children who have special needs — will receive fair treatment from your estate.

  • Reduce your estate taxes or eliminate them completely.
  • Take advantage of all other tax breaks to which you might be entitled.
  • Retain complete control over your assets while you live.
  • Put your legacy out of the reach of your heirs’ predators, creditors and others seeking a piece of your estate.
  • Choose when, where and how you will make gifts to friends, family and worthwhile organizations.
  • Enjoy peace of mind in the knowledge that you can make provisions for your care should injury, illness or some other incapacity make you unable to do so for yourself.

© American Academy of Estate Planning Attorneys, Inc.

USCIS Will Temporarily Suspend Premium Processing for Fiscal Year 2019 H-1B Cap Petitions

U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) has just announced that it will temporarily suspend Premium Processing for all Fiscal Year (FY) 2019 H-1B cap-subject petitions.

USCIS will continue to accept Premium Processing for non-cap subject petitions, including H extensions, H amendments, and H change of employer cases.

Petitioners may request expedited processing of H-1B cap petitions if they meet certain criteria listed on the USCIS Expedite Criteria page.

What to Expect:

  • USCIS has advised that this suspension is expected to last until Sept. 10, 2018.
  • Based on 2017 H-1B cap lottery process, we expect USCIS may issue receipt notices for FY2019 cap-subject H-1B petitions by the end of May, and adjudications (or Requests for Evidence) may take place between July and September.

Gibney is actively monitoring developments and we will provide an update when Premium Processing for cap-subject H-1B petitions resumes.

If you have any questions about this alert, please contact your Gibney representative or email info@gibney.com.

USCIS Announces E-Verify Unavailable March 23 – 26, 2018

U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) has announced that E-Verify will be unavailable from Friday, March 23 at 12:00 A.M. to Monday, March 26 at 8:00 A.M. EDT due to a system update.

USCIS has released a fact sheet containing the following guidance:

  • The following services will be unavailable during the update:
    • Enrolling in E-Verify
    • Creating new cases
    • Viewing or updating any existing cases
    • Creating, updating, or deleting user accounts
    • Resetting passwords
    • Editing company information
    • Running reports
    • Terminating enrollment

While E-Verify is unavailable:

  • The three day rule for creating E-Verify cases will be suspended.  Employers will have until March 29 to submit E-Verify queries for all employees hired or rehired between March 20 and March 26.
  • The time period during which employees may resolve TNCs will be extended by two federal working days.

If you have any questions about this alert, please contact your Gibney representative or email info@gibney.com.

Where There’s a Will, There’s a Probate

Many Americans think that passing on their worldly goods is a simple proposition: they write out their final wishes, then, someone ensures that their wishes are carried out. Unfortunately, wills require probate, and in many states, there’s nothing simple about probate. It’s usually a highly technical, complicated and bureaucratic process that can drown your heirs in a sea of red tape. There are exceptions, however. In some states, small estates may be eligible for short-form probate. See your estate planning attorney to learn how your state’s probate rules will affect your estate.

HOW PROBATE WORKS

Roughly speaking, the process begins with the filing of your will and a petition to the courts to begin probate. The probate court will either approve your choice of executor (the person who will oversee the disposition of your estate) that you may have named in your will, or will appoint someone else to act as executor. Unless your estate is fairly simple, your executor may also hire an attorney to help with the process. (You may stipulate that your attorney also serves as your executor, for a modest savings in administration fees.)

At some point, your executor will have to present your will to the court and obtain its ruling on the validity of this document. Your executor must publish notification of your death and contact all your creditors so that they can submit their claims against your estate.

And we’re just getting started. Someone will have to inventory the valuables you’ve left behind, and appraisers may be called in to establish their value.

Depending on the state in which you lived, your heirs may be denied access to your assets until the final disposition of your estate. And in most states, a contest over the validity of your will virtually guarantees that your assets will be placed off limits until the will contest is decided.

Here is another aspect of probate that can cost your heirs dearly. Your executor must adhere to stringent rules governing your investments during the probate process. These rules limit your executor’s ability to buy, sell or take other action to preserve the value of fluctuating investments—such as stocks, bonds, and real estate in your portfolio. So, if in the midst of your probate, a bull market turns bearish, the bond market goes south, or the real estate market plunges, your heirs could be left with assets that have depreciated substantially.

At best, your heirs may be inconvenienced by their lack of access to and control over your assets during probate; at worst, they may endure financial hardship. So, if they breathe a sigh of relief as your probate begins to wind down, they may be in for a disappointment.

Before your heirs receive their full legacy from your estate, your creditors will be paid off, estate taxes will be paid, your executor and administrator will receive their fees for handling your probate, and all court fees will have to be settled. After these expenses have been paid, your heirs will divvy up what’s left—and it’s often considerably less after probate than before.

That’s a quick overview of the probate process. At best, it’s a bureaucratic nightmare. At worst, it exposes your heirs to the following problems:

IN THE PUBLIC EYE

Your probate proceedings will usually be published in a general circulation newspaper in your community. This unwelcomed publicity goes well beyond turning your life into an open book: it can also expose your loved ones to the abuse of opportunists. Con artists, creditors, overly aggressive sales people, and those eager to exploit any financial weaknesses in an estate, routinely avail themselves of probate records. They may simply be looking to buy your personal effects at a heavy discount, or they may wish to prey on your loved ones for more sinister reasons. Regardless of their motives, they pose a threat you’ll want to shelter your loved ones from. And you can’t do that if your estate goes through probate.

THE WAITING GAME

The good news is that probate usually ensures that your wishes for your loved ones probably will be carried out as you’ve directed. The bad news is that it will take time, and in the intervening months—or even years—your family may have precious little access to your assets.

The average length of time for probate varies from state to state. But in general, you can expect your probate can take 1 to 3 years , and that’s if your affairs are relatively straightforward. It isn’t uncommon for probate to take several years.

PAYING THE PIPER—AND THE REST OF THE BAND

It goes without saying that a process this bureaucratic and time-consuming, with such a large cast of characters, exacts a considerable price. Everyone gets paid: the attorney, your executor, the appraisers, the courts, the taxing authorities, and your creditors. Only after they’ve gotten their cut will your heirs be able to take their share out of what’s left. How much of your estate remains will vary considerably. If yours is a complex estate, or if there is litigation, such as a will contest, the expense of probate can seriously erode what’s left for your loved ones. But having a simple estate and a well-drafted will doesn’t protect you from probate’s expenses.

Whether they get paid a flat fee or fees based on a percentage of the value of your estate, the services of an attorney, executor and appraisers will reduce the assets your loved ones inherit. Probate fees vary from state to state, but here are the national averages: attorney’s fees alone will range from 2% to 4%   of the value of your estate, with a median of 3% ; your executor’s fees will range anywhere from 1% to 5%   (if your attorney also serves as your executor, the total fees likely will be reduced somewhat); add to their fees such expenses as the appraisers’ fees and court costs, and your estate’s value could be reduced by as much as 15%, or more .

If you are married and you and your spouse have based your estate planning on a Simple Will, in some states you can expect your estate to go through probate twice—once after the death of each spouse. So, you may have to double the impact of all probate’s expenses on the value of your estate.

TAXES AND OTHER PROBLEMS

The estate tax has been the subject of a great deal of fluctuation in the last 10-15 years. The amount that could be passed free of estate tax changed nearly every year. However, in search for ways to reduce the federal deficit, Congress will likely continue to make changes in the future. A married person can transfer an unlimited amount to their spouse through the use of the Unlimited Marital Deduction. However, the surviving spouse would have to pay tax on all the assets at their death. Unless “portability” was elected at the death of the first spouse, the surviving spouse would only have his or her own exclusion to use.

While “portability” simplifies things and can be useful in some circumstances, it does not necessitate an estate tax return to be filed at the first death, even if it would not be otherwise required. A Living Trust can be a great way to minimize estate taxes and other problems. There are many reasons that a couple might plan their Living Trust to have the first spouse leave their assets in a separate “Family” or “B” Trust for the benefit of the survivor and children, rather than relying on portability. A Family Trust not only locks in the deceased spouse’s exclusion amount, even growth of the trust would be excluded from the survivor’s estate. Further, the trust could be exempt from tax even in the estate of the children. Portability does not allow for this.

A separate Family Trust allows for many protections that portability does not provide. The trust can provide creditor protection, both in the event of the survivor’s remarriage and subsequent divorce, and even from other creditors. Also, a Family Trust can lock in the ultimate beneficiaries of the assets. This can be important, especially in blended families.

INVITING SPOILERS TO THE PARTY

Simply making out a will doesn’t mean things will go as you planned. Disgruntled family members, creditors, “predators,” and other would-be spoilers can throw a monkey wrench into the works.
Probate is a vulnerable time for your loved ones. Just about any disgruntled relative can contest a will, with potentially devastating consequences. Defending against a will contest is a costly process that can delay the disposition of your estate considerably. That’s why spoilers employ it. They know the threat of these additional expenses and delays is often enough to intimidate heirs into a settlement they may not be entitled to. Even if your heirs decide to fight a will contest and ultimately prevail in court, they may find they’ve won the battle and lost the war.

AVOIDING PROBATE

Is it any wonder the only fans of probate are probate lawyers? In contrast, most Americans who know what probate entails try to avoid it at all costs.
In case you’re thinking you can spare your heirs the hassles of probate by dying intestate, without a will, forget it. The creaky wheels of probate are set in motion whether you have a will or not. And if anything, probate becomes more complicated, not less so, when you die intestate.

So, if you’ve decided that probate is the last thing you want to bequeath your loved ones, how do you avoid it?

Instead, you could turn to a handful of strategies for circumventing the probate process. There’s no probate, for example, on assets such as IRAs, life insurance policies, and pension plans for which you name a beneficiary. Also, any assets you hold in “joint tenancy with rights of survivorship” pass immediately to your joint tenant. And, of course, you can simply give away your assets while living. While these methods avoid the pitfalls of probate, they have plenty of shortcomings of their own, and should be used carefully and only in certain circumstances. (For more information on joint tenancy, see our Academy Report titled, The Trouble with Joint Tenancy.)

THE SOLUTION: THE REVOCABLE LIVING TRUST

For many reasons—avoiding probate being just one of them—the Revocable Living Trust is widely considered the most effective and versatile estate planning tool. The first discovery you’ll make about the Living Trust is that it avoids probate. So, you’re immediately avoiding problems that come with it:

  • Publicity
  • Delays
  • Expenses
  • Opportunities for Spoilers

In contrast, with a Living Trust, you safeguard your privacy, dramatically expedite the disposition of your estate, significantly reduce costs, and greatly diminish opportunities for spoilers to upset your plans. Those advantages alone are enough to make Living Trusts the estate planning tool of choice for many Americans. But consider these additional benefits that Living Trusts provide as well:

  • You can use a Living Trust to take care of your healthcare and financial needs should you become disabled. Considering that for most of our lives we face a much greater likelihood of becoming disabled than dying, a Living Trust can provide considerable peace of mind.
  • A Living Trust can help you maximize estate tax planning.
  • A Living Trust gives you maximum control over the disposition of your assets. For instance, if you have children from a previous marriage, you can ensure that your spouse and your children receive fair treatment.
  • A Living Trust dramatically reduces the threat of “spoilers.” In most states, your trust can also include a ‘no-contest’ clause which deters greedy claimants from attacking your estate plan.
  • As long as your Living Trust owns your assets, it protects them from your heirs’ creditors and “predators.” So, a daughter won’t see the legacy you’ve left her become the spoils of a divorce settlement. Or a son won’t find the assets you bequeathed him depleted by his creditors.
  • A Living Trust will allow you to control your assets long after you’re gone. That’s especially important if you’ve left behind minor children or young adults who may need time to grow into their financial responsibilities.

HOW A LIVING TRUST WORKS

With a Living Trust, you own nothing, and your trust owns everything. But not to worry. Since you are your trust’s trustee and beneficiary, you retain complete control of your assets. You can derive income from your trust, sell assets, acquire new assets, and do anything you need to with the property in your trust. And rest assured, as its name implies, you can amend or revoke your trust at any time. In every practical sense, having a Living Trust is almost identical to owning all your property directly.

The difference occurs when you die. Since you technically owned nothing, there’s no property that needs to go through probate. Instead, your property is quickly distributed according to the precise instructions written into your trust. Carrying out your instructions is your handpicked agent—your successor trustee—who will follow your directions to the letter. There’s no need to obtain the approval of a court, no additional expenses, and no details of your Living Trust are made public.

These advantages are so important they bear repeating: with a Living Trust, your estate completely avoids the publicity, expense, delay, and other disadvantages of probate.

YOUR FIRST STEP IN DESIGNING YOUR LIVING TRUST

Creating a Living Trust tailored to your unique needs, reflecting the laws in your state, and delivering the greatest benefit to you and your family requires expert help—and that means an attorney, preferably one who concentrates his or her practice on estate planning.

But not just any estate planning attorney. If you go to one who has built a practice around probate, don’t be surprised if what you get is a will. In fact, many attorneys offer substantial discounts on will preparation, counting on the substantial fees they will earn when your estate goes through probate. Instead, look for an attorney who emphasizes Living Trusts.

Once a prospective attorney demonstrates sufficient expertise in Living Trusts, make sure he or she passes the next most important test: Does the attorney listen well? If not, move on to the next candidate. Why? Because no two clients have the same circumstances, financial profiles, and family situations. So listening carefully to you will be the only way your attorney can ensure he or she is providing you with a Living Trust that meets your needs.

Next, consider how well the attorney will be able to work with your family. It will be a great comfort to them to have on hand a professional who was not only familiar with your wishes, but who also has the expertise and people skills to help them through what may be an emotionally difficult time.

Finally, choose an attorney with whom you can feel comfortable sharing your hopes, dreams and fears. Creating a Living Trust is an intensely personal experience, during which we consider our own mortality, take a hard look at our life’s work, deal with family dynamics, and decide how we’ll provide for our loved ones. Your attorney should have the professionalism, tact, and humanity to help you explore all these issues, and resolve them in a way that leaves you feeling satisfied, with lasting peace of mind.

© American Academy of Estate Planning Attorneys, Inc.