New York Legislature Passes Counterfeit Goods Donation Bill

New York State Senators Joseph A. Griffo (R) and Martin J. Golden (R) introduced a bill empowering courts to order seized counterfeit products to be donated to a not-for-profit corporation rather than destroyed.  The bill passed in the New York State Legislature in June.

If the court determines that the counterfeit products should be donated, then notice must be given to the lawful mark owner of the counterfeit products. The trademark owner has 30 days to object, in writing, to the donation.  Failure to respond within that time frame constitutes consent to having the products donated.

The bill states that counterfeit products may only be donated to a “not-for-profit corporation that has an established history of providing goods and services to indigent individuals.”  The judge determines if an organization qualifies to receive counterfeit products.

The selected organization must have the products’ tags removed or have the products “marked, altered, imprinted, or indelibly stamped so as to prevent their resale or any confusion with the actual products of the lawful mark owner.”  The organization may not sell the counterfeit products.  Similarly, any person or organization in possession of these counterfeit products may not sell these products.  The only type of counterfeit product that currently qualifies for donation is clothing.

IRS Announces New Options for Taxpayers with Undisclosed Foreign Bank Accounts

This week the IRS announced a new guidance on the options available for taxpayers with undisclosed foreign bank accounts.  The guidance comes with some pros and cons for the individual looking to come forward and become compliant with their filing obligations.

On the plus side, the IRS has opened up its Streamline Compliance Procedure to a far greater number of individuals.  In order to qualify under the old Streamline Compliance Procedure, effective September 1, 2012, the individual had to have been living abroad, have not filed US tax returns and owed less than $1,500 in tax.  If you met these requirements you were able to file three years past due returns, six years past due FBARs, pay no penalty and be compliant with US laws.  Now, under the new Streamline Compliance Procedure, US residents and citizens  are able to file three years amended tax returns, six years delinquent FBARs and pay a penalty of 5% of the highest account balance from the last six years to become compliant with US laws; provided, however, the failure to file must not have been a willful failure.

The IRS has no doubt expanded this program after much of the negative attention surrounding the Offshore Voluntary Disclosure Program (“OVDP”).  In particular, the Taxpayer Advocate has criticized the OVDP for its punitive scheme, imposing high penalties and excessive delays on those that inadvertently failed to file.  The Taxpayer Advocate further suggested the expansion of the Streamline Compliance Procedure to include all benign actors, including US residents and those owing more than $1,500 in tax.

Those individuals living abroad can still qualify for a zero penalty as was allowed under the old Streamline Compliance Procedures.

Those individuals who have already entered the OVDP may feel cheated; however, the IRS also published guidance on transition relief.  The program participants will have to continue to make a full submission, including six years amended tax returns and FBAR filings but if they can show that they were not willful they may qualify for a reduced penalty of 5%.

In light of the recent case  USA v. Zwerner, those individuals that are fearful that the failure to file may be willful may still want to enter the OVDP in order to fix the amount of penalties.  In Zwerner the IRS imposed the full 50% penalty for each year of the failure, thus, even after a reduction by the Court, the total penalties came out to greater than the account balance.

For those entering the OVDP though the changes announced this week are not all good.  In particular, the IRS has increased the 27.5% penalty to a 50% penalty where the financial institution where the taxpayer’s account was held or the taxpayer’s advisor is under investigation by the IRS or DOJ.

Voters in Switzerland Pass Measure to Restrict Immigration

On February 24, 2014, voters in Switzerland passed a popular referendum to amend Switzerland’s constitution and restrict immigration, reflecting a departure from the freedom of movement allowed European Union (EU) nationals under existing agreements.  The Swiss Federal Council interpreted the referendum as a response to population growth, increased immigration, and an attempt to protect the local labor force.

The new provisions will impose restrictions on residence permits for foreign nationals by implementing a quota system.  These quotas will impact cross-border commuters and asylum seekers. The new constitutional provisions require legislative action and further negotiation with the European Union before measures can be fully implemented.

Currently, Switzerland has a dual system for the admission of foreign workers:  one system for EU nationals and one system for other workers. Gainfully employed nationals from EU or European Free Trade Agreement (EFTA) states can benefit from agreements on the free movement of persons.  Only a limited number of management level employees, specialists and other qualified employees are admitted from all other countries.  The referendum reintroduces strict quotas for immigration from EU countries, contrary to the current Swiss-EU agreement on freedom of movement.

The provisions do not specify precise quota numbers nor do they clearly define procedures for the allocation of work permits. The Swiss Federal Council and Parliament have three years to implement the new system. The Agreement on Free Movement of Persons and other bilateral agreements will remain in force until new provisions are implemented.

The Swiss Federal Council intends to start negotiations with the European Union and put an implementation plan in place by the end of 2014.  Gibney will provide updates regarding the implementation of these changes as they become available.

If you have any questions regarding this alert, please contact your designated Gibney representative, or email info@gibney.com.

U.S. Visa Waiver Program to Include Chile

On February 28, 2014, the U.S. Department of Homeland Security announced Chile’s designation as the newest member of the Visa Waiver Program. Eligible Chilean nationals who have an electronically readable passport and have obtained authorization for travel from Electronic Screening System for Travel Authorization (ESTA) prior to initiating travel will be able to visit the United States under the Visa Waiver Program (VWP) commencing May 1, 2014.

For more information regarding the VWP, list of designated countries, and ESTA requirements, please visit the Department of State website at http://www.travel.state.gov/visa/temp/without/without_1261.html.

IRS Revenue Procedure 2014-18 Extends Taxpayer Deadline to File Portability Elections

Beginning in 2011, the surviving spouse was able to inherit the portion of the deceased spouse’s unused estate tax exemption.  This was called portability of the exemption.  In order to qualify for portability the executor of the estate of a deceased spouse was required to timely file an Estate Tax return (Form 706) even though no estate tax was due and the estate tax return was not otherwise required. Many surviving spouses were not familiar with this rule and missed the filing deadline.  A new Revenue Procedure released by the IRS in January, extends the deadline for filing Form 706 for the purpose of electing portability until December 31, 2014. The deceased spouse must have died after December 31, 2010 and before December 31, 2013 in order to be eligible for this extension.

This Revenue Procedure has direct consequences for same sex couples whose marriages were recognized by the 2013 Supreme Court decision, United States v. Windsor. If the first spouse died during the aforementioned period, the spouse’s estate may file the Form 706 to elect portability to the surviving spouse.

Bankruptcy Protection for Inherited IRA’s

An important issue affecting many estate plans will soon be decided by the United States Supreme Court. Estate planners are often confronted with the question of whether their clients should leave their IRA’s outright to their heirs or whether to leave the IRA’s in trust.  The case to be decided by the Supreme Court, Clark v. Rameker, involved Heidi Heffron-Clark who inherited an IRA from her mother. Mrs. Heffron-Clark and her husband subsequently filed for bankruptcy. Usually retirement accounts are protected in bankruptcy proceedings.  In this case the bankruptcy judge held that the inherited IRA was not protected because the funds in an inherited IRA may be withdrawn and are not solely for the heir’s retirement.

The bankruptcy court decision was appealed to a federal district court which held for Mrs. Heffron-Clark.  When that decision was appealed to the Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals the decision of the bankruptcy judge was upheld.

The Supreme Court will decide the issue because there is a conflict of the Seventh Circuit and the Fifth Circuit and Eighth Circuit Courts of Appeals. The Fifth and Eighth circuits have previously held that the inherited IRA’s are protected because the protection is for the IRA regardless of whether it is inherited or not.

Planners and clients wanting to avoid this uncertainty should use trusts to protect their heirs’ inherited IRA’s while awaiting the Supreme Court decision.

January 2014 Visa Bulletin Released

The U.S. Department of State (DOS) has published the January 2014 Visa Bulletin.  The December 2013 Visa Bulletin showed significant retrogression in the EB-2 category for India, true to predictions made by the DOS Visa Office in November. The January 2014 Visa Bulletin further confirms that in addition to the ongoing retrogression in the EB-2 category, there is no movement in any of the other employment-based categories for India. For China, the priority date in the EB-2 category has advanced by one month, whereas in the EB-3 category the priority date has advanced by six months. The priority date in the EB-3 category for the Worldwide and Mexico quotas has also advanced by six months. Priority cut-off dates for the most common employment-based categories are provided below. Foreign nationals having a priority date before the established cut-off date are eligible to file immigrant visa or adjustment of status applications for permanent residence.

Employment-based, first preference (EB-1):

All foreign nationals: Current

“Current” means that immigrant visa numbers are immediately available for all priority dates within the designated preference category.

Employment-based, second preference (EB-2):

  • Worldwide: Current
  • China: December 8, 2008
  • India: November 15, 2004
  • Mexico: Current
  • Philippines: Current

Employment-based, third preference (EB-3) professional/skilled workers:

  • Worldwide: April 1, 2012
  • China: April 1, 2012
  • India: September 1, 2003
  • Mexico: April 1, 2012
  • Philippines: February 15, 2007

Employment-based, third preference (EB-3) “other” workers:

  • Worldwide: April 1, 2012
  • China: April 1, 2012
  • India: September 1, 2003
  • Mexico: April 1, 2012
  • Philippines: February 15, 2007

For specific questions or legal advice, please contact your immigration professional at Gibney, Anthony & Flaherty, LLP, or email immigrationalerts@gibney.com.

Time To Begin Preparation of H-1B CAP FY 2015 Petitions

On April 1, 2014, United States Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) will begin accepting H-1B petitions subject to cap limits for the fiscal year (FY) 2015.  Although April may seem far off, several factors including increasing demands for H-1B workers, an anticipated high volume of Labor Condition Application (LCA) filings, and the possibility of another federal government shutdown signal that it is not too early for employers to being preparing for the H-1B cap season now.

The H-1B cap for FY 2014 was reached within the first week of filing and a lottery to select H-1B petitions for adjudication was conducted for the first time since 2008. With employers filing H-1B petitions for those who missed the most recent year’s cap, as well as new petitions being filed on behalf of graduates and new employees, we anticipate that a large number of H-1B cap FY 2015 filings will result in the H-1B quota being quickly reached.  An increase in H-1B cap petitions will lead to a high volume of Labor Condition Application (LCA) filings, a required component of all H-1B petitions. Consequently, we could see significantly slower processing times and backlogs within the Department of Labor (DOL).  Furthermore, should another federal government shutdown occur in January, it is likely that the processing of LCAs would be halted, possibly impacting a company’s ability to file H-1B cap petitions on April 1st.

We urge employers to identify potential H-1B cap cases now and work with immigration counsel to ensure timely filing of cases.

If you have any questions about this alert, please contact your Gibney representative or email immigrationalerts@gibney.com.

Obama Administration Sued for Trademark Infringement

On October 7, 2014, My Retirement Account Services, LLC sued the United States Treasury Department for trademark infringement.

My Retirement Account Services, LLC, located in Murray, KY, is the owner of the federally registered trademark GETMYRA.COM, for individual retirement account services. The plaintiff claims to have used the common law mark MYRA to identify and distinguish its services since at least as early as 2009. They have also applied to register it with the United States Patent and Trademark Office. On January 28, 2014, President Obama gave his State of Union Address, during which he announced his plan to create a new retirement savings program to be called “myRA.” After the State of the Union Address, the plaintiff alleges that it saw a substantial increase in visitors. The Complaint states that, “At 8:00 p.m. on January 28, 2014, the site experienced a 1400% increase in sessions, as compared to the hour before.” The site continued to receive a significant number of visitors following the speech.

Notably, on January 30, 2014, the United States Department of Treasury filed an application to register “myRA” for retirement savings program services. The United States Patent and Trademark Office rejected the application and cited the GETMYRA.COM registration as confusingly similar to the “myRA” mark.

In the Complaint, the plaintiff claims that the “myRA” mark is confusingly similar to its own marks. The plaintiff claims that this is reverse confusion. Specifically, the plaintiff is concerned that consumers are likely to believe that the plaintiff is the infringer and thus, it has suffered damage to its reputation and goodwill.

Expected Retrogression of Priority Dates Announced on Visa Bulletin

The Department of State Visa Office recently announced its predictions regarding the future movement of priority dates. Priority dates determine the order of immigrant visa availability and essentially establish an individual’s place in line to apply for U.S. Lawful Permanent Resident status (also known as an immigrant visa or “green card”).

As of December 2013, the Employment-Based Second Preference (“EB-2”) category for Indian nationals is expected to retrogress from the present priority date of June 15, 2008 to a date in either 2004 or 2005. The Visa Office attributes this retrogression to the “upgrading” of preference category, from the Employment-Based Third Preference (“EB-3”) category to the EB-2 category, which occurs when an employer files an EB-2 case on behalf of a foreign national previously sponsored in the EB-3 category. Presently, the EB-3 category for Indian nationals has a priority date of September 22, 2003, meaning that only those Indian nationals with a priority date before September 22, 2003 are eligible for green card issuance.  Priority dates for this category are expected to continue to move slowly.

In addition, the priority date for the EB-3 category is expected to move ahead of the EB-2 category for Chinese nationals beginning in December 2013. This means that for Chinese nationals, the wait for an EB-3 priority date to become current is expected to be less than the wait for an EB-2 priority date to become current.

The Visa Office predicts that priority dates for the worldwide EB-3 category (i.e, for nationals of countries other than China, India, Mexico and the Philippines) will advance to 2011 in December 2013, from the current priority date of October 1, 2010.

The Department of State Visa Office predictions for the advancement and retrogression of priority dates are not assurances or guarantees, as visa availability from month to month is determined by usage across the various categories throughout the year, and are adjusted by the Department of State accordingly.

For additional information, please contact your designated Gibney representative or email immigrationalerts@gibney.com.